Header image

Genuinely Autonomous Systems: Local Mesh Networks for Disaster Procurement

October 2025

Most disaster-telecom plans assume restoration from the “outside-in”: hardened mobile cores, broadcaster coverage, and satellite as a last resort. That architecture centralizes capacity and accountability; it also centralizes failure. The alternative lens—genuinely autonomous systems—asks whether neighborhoods can keep voice, messaging, maps, and bulletin pages operating without backhaul or a privileged operator. Post-event assessments from the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake documented multi-day impairment of mobile and fixed networks, mixed satellite performance, and municipal radio limits; at the same time, social-science evidence linked denser local ties to lower mortality and faster recovery. The technical means to serve both realities already exist in sub-GHz Wi-Fi HaLow (IEEE 802.11ah) and LoRa. The gap is institutional rather than electrical1.

"Genuinely autonomous" denotes local services—alerts, voice, chat, maps, file caches—that work with no Internet uplink or external control plane. Backhaul is additive.

Evidence: isolation and social outcomes

Empirical records from 3.11 show first-week communications rated “poor to moderate” for mobile and landline data by responder teams; satellite helped but unevenly, and user satisfaction rose only gradually as restoration proceeded. Policy reviews since then emphasize redundancy and multipath routing, yet spending patterns continue to favor large licensed infrastructures. Parallel work in disaster sociology finds social capital—trust and civic participation—predicts mortality and recovery even after controlling for hazard exposure. Local communications are not ancillary to that dynamic; they enable coordination when external links fail2.

Technical readiness: Wi-Fi HaLow and LoRa

Wi-Fi HaLow (802.11ah) operates below 1 GHz with longer reach and better penetration than 2.4/5 GHz Wi-Fi, speaks native IP, and carries standard Wi-Fi security (WPA3/Enhanced Open). Independent evaluations and industry trials report extended range, improved material penetration, and device-density gains relevant to neighborhood service during outages. These characteristics map well to post-disaster needs: short voice prompts, local web bulletins, low-bitrate photos, and LAN-scope VoIP/chat3.

LoRa complements HaLow with ultra-low-power paging and telemetry. Standard LoRaWAN uses a centralized star-of-stars topology with network servers—ideal for managed metering, less suited if the backhaul is severed—whereas P2P/mesh at the application layer trades throughput for autonomy. For Japan, ARIB STD-T108 and LoRa Alliance regional parameters (AS923-JP) codify Listen-Before-Talk and duty/airtime limits that govern compliant unlicensed operation4.

"Duty ratio" and LBT (listen before talk/transmit) are the principal regulatory constraints in Japan's 920 MHz bands (ARIB STD-T108); the LoRa Alliance explicitly references T108 for AS923-JP devices.

Japan as an instructive case

Japan has a clear legal route for sub-GHz unlicensed deployments (ARIB STD-T108; updated English edition 2020) and an active research lineage on resilient meshes that bridge satellite, UAV, and ground nodes (NICT). The carrier side has long offered managed LPWAN (e.g., SoftBank’s 2016 LoRaWAN program). In parallel, municipalities and vendors have begun to pilot Wi-Fi HaLow for evacuation support and community drills—e.g., the Nobeoka City projects (FY2024-2025) under MIC’s regional digital-infrastructure programs, with public write-ups from Fujitsu and TOA and local broadcast coverage. The technology and regulatory paths exist; the procurement footholds are narrow5.

Why procurement screens out autonomy

Tender templates tend to equate reliability with vendor SLAs and regional uptime, not continuity of local service under isolation. Auditability favors one counterparty and a uniform capital asset, not many small nodes plus community training. Emergency communications curricula skew toward licensed radio and satellite procedure, not IP mesh routing, captive portals, local DNS, or content caching. None of these barriers arise from the radios; they arise from how reliability is measured and who is authorized to deliver it. (Recent MIC/Digital Agency materials continue to frame “digital infrastructure” through centrally delivered services, even when calling for new local technologies including HaLow.)6

"Captive portal" is the OS-triggered sign-in page for a Wi-Fi network. It's launched by captive-portal signals (DHCP/RA hints or HTTP interception) and can serve local pages without Internet access.

A pragmatic architecture

Adopt a layered approach that adds a local-first mesh beneath national systems:

  • A handful of HaLow APs with mesh/relay enabled, solar-backed power, and indoor reach to apartments and shelters.
  • A LoRa control channel for paging/sensors and wake-up signaling when power is scarce.
  • A shoebox server at a community site hosting a captive portal, static maps, evacuation lists, an on-LAN SIP registrar, and offline docs.

When backhaul is present, the system syncs and updates; when absent, the neighborhood still functions. Field trials and lab studies indicate this stack is feasible with certified modules and modest budgets per node7.

What to change in procurement

  1. Recognize unlicensed community networks as valid redundant systems. Provide a compliance checklist aligned with ARIB STD-T108/AS923-JP (band plan, LBT, duty, power, enclosures, maintenance logs)5.

  2. Add a “local continuity under isolation” metric to tenders. Test for a defined window (e.g., 24-48 h forced uplink outage) whether bidders deliver: (a) audible area-wide prompts, (b) a LAN-scope web bulletin, and (c) text/voice chat across the neighborhood. Procurement shifts behavior when evaluation rubrics reward the desired outcome.

Risk and mitigation

Unlicensed operation is constrained by LBT/airtime and susceptible to interference; power is often the first bottleneck. These are routine engineering considerations—coverage planning, brown-out modes, spare batteries—not reasons to exclude autonomy5.

The social dividend

Networks that residents help install and operate function as preparedness routines, not just artifacts. Training and drills conducted over the same paths used for everyday notices build familiarity; the literature linking social capital and survival suggests these investments pay double: redundancy during outages and stronger ties year-round. Complementary international evidence on community-centred connectivity models points to workable stewardship and sustainability patterns8.

The technology is ready; the rules already permit it. Update procurement so that autonomy is not filtered out by design.


  1. World Bank. Information and Communication Technology for Disaster Risk Management in Japan: How Digital Solutions Are Reshaping Disaster Risk Management (2019). PDF. (World Bank↩︎

  2. H. Yamamura et al. “Communication Problems After the Great East Japan Earthquake of 2011.” Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 29(3), 2014. Open access (PMC). (PMC↩︎

  3. D. P. Aldrich & Y. Sawada. “The Physical and Social Determinants of Mortality in the 2011 Tsunami.” Social Science & Medicine 124, 2015. (Publisher & author-hosted PDF.) (ScienceDirect↩︎

  4. Wi-Fi Alliance. Wi-Fi CERTIFIED HaLow™ Technology Overview (2021) and security note (WPA3/Enhanced Open). PDFs. (20524844.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net↩︎

  5. Wireless Broadband Alliance. Wi-Fi HaLow for IoT: Phase-Two Field Trials (news and report, July 2024). (Wireless Broadband Alliance↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎

  6. L. Kane et al. “An Experimental Field Comparison of Wi-Fi HaLow and LoRa for Long-Range IoT Connectivity.” Sensors 23(16), 2023. Open access. (PMC↩︎

  7. LoRa Alliance. RP002-1.0.3 LoRaWAN® Regional Parameters (May 5, 2021)—AS923-JP requires LBT based on ARIB STD-T108. PDF. (LoRa Alliance®↩︎

  8. ARIB (Japan). STD-T108: 920 MHz-Band Telemeter, Telecontrol and Data Transmission Radio Equipment (English ed. v1.4, Oct 30 2020). PDF. (arib.or.jp↩︎